Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732399›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Intraperitoneal paclitaxel for patients with primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a phase I/II dose escalation and safety study-INTERACT MESO.

Job P van Kooten, Michelle V Dietz, Niels A D Guchelaar, Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof, Stijn L W Koolen, Jacobus W A Burger, Ron H J Mathijssen, Cornelis Verhoef, Joachim G J V Aerts, Eva V E Madsen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Job P van Kooten *Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michelle V Dietz *Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands m.dietz@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-3022
Niels A D GuchelaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandra R M Brandt-KerkhofDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joachim G J V AertsDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva V E MadsenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Kanker Instituut, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMalignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, aggressive tumour arising primarily from the peritoneum. The only potentially curative treatment is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the majority of patients are not eligible to undergo this treatment. The benefit of systemic treatment for these patients is limited at the cost of considerable morbidity. Hence, there is a need for appropriate palliative treatment options for patients with MPM. As MPM rarely disseminates outside the abdominal cavity, these patients might benefit from local treatment. A higher, more effective dose of chemotherapy can directly be delivered at the site of the disease. Systemic uptake will be limited, likely resulting in less toxicity. The aim of the INTERACT MESO trial is to determine the maximum tolerable dose of intraperitoneal paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with MPM. Secondary endpoints are to assess safety and toxicity, feasibility and the pharmacokinetic profile of this treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The INTERACT MESO trial is a prospective, open-label, single-centre, phase I study with a classic three-plus-three dose escalation design. The study population consists of adult patients with primary MPM, without extra-abdominal disease, who are not eligible to undergo CRS-HIPEC. According to standard of care work-up for CRS-HIPEC, patients will undergo diagnostic laparoscopy to determine the feasibility of CRS-HIPEC. In case CRS-HIPEC is not considered feasible, a peritoneal port-a-cath (PAC) system will be placed. Through this PAC, 8-16 weekly cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy will be administered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO, The Hague, The Netherlands) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee (METC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) have granted permission to carry out this study protocol. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9718. EudraCT: 2021-003637-11.

Indexed as

Mesothelioma, MalignantPaclitaxelPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultHumansProspective StudiesPaclitaxelchemotherapyclinical trialsoncologysurgerytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35732399
PMCPMC9226944
OpenAlexW4283275870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.