ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2023
Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service.
Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of the PARTNERS model of care within two UK community mental health transformation systems: a qualitative realist evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Health Bill brings NHS management back into government.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Article
- Medical Learner Perspectives on Restorative Practices to Address Medical Racism.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Exploring the Gender Preferences for Healthcare Providers and Their Influence on Patient Satisfaction.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Professionalising patient safety? Findings from a mixed-methods formative evaluation of the patient safety specialist role in the English National Health Service.Journal of health services research & policy · 2025Article
- Blockchain Factors in the Design of Smart-Media for E-Healthcare Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Establishing a Just Culture: Implications for the Veterans Health Administration Journey to High Reliability.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024Article
- A decade after Francis: is the NHS safer and more open?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Schwartz Rounds in Higher Education Settings: A Systematic Review of the Research with Recommendations.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe National Health Service (NHS) in England has introduced a range of policy measures aimed at fostering greater openness, transparency and candour about quality and safety. We draw on the findings of an evaluation of the implementation of these policies in NHS organisations, with the aim of identifying key implications for policy and practice.
methodsWe undertook a mixed-methods policy evaluation, comprising four substudies: a longitudinal analysis of data from surveys of NHS staff and service users; interviews with senior stakeholders in NHS provider organisations and the wider system; a survey of board members of NHS provider organisations and organisational case studies across acute, community and mental health, and ambulance services.
resultsOur findings indicate a mixed picture of progress towards improving openness in NHS organisations, influenced by organisational history and memories of past efforts, and complicated by organisational heterogeneity. We identify four features that appear to be necessary conditions for sustained progress in improving openness: (1) authentic integration into organisational mission is crucial in making openness a day-to-day concern; (2) functional and effective administrative systems are vital; (3) these systems must be leavened by flexibility and sensitivity in implementation and (4) a spirit of continuous inquiry, learning and improvement is required to avoid the fallacy that advancing openness can be reduced to a time-limited project. We also identify four persistent challenges in consolidating and sustaining improvement: (1) a reliance on goodwill and discretionary effort; (2) caring for staff, patients and relatives who seek openness; (3) the limits of values-driven approaches on their own and (4) the continued marginality of patients, carers and families.
conclusionsVariation in policy implementation offers important lessons on how organisations can better deliver openness, transparency and candour. These lessons highlight practical actions for policymakers, managers and senior clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.