Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731938›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Growth-rate model predicts in vivo tumor response from in vitro data.

Rocky Diegmiller, Laurent Salphati, Bruno Alicke, Timothy R Wilson, Thomas J Stout, Marc Hafner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dissecting sources of variability in patient response to targeted therapy: anti-HER2 therapies as a case study.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Growth-rate model predicts in vivo tumor response from in vitro data.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rocky DiegmillerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6115-7891
Laurent SalphatiDepartment of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Bruno AlickeDepartment of Translational Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Timothy R WilsonDepartment of Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Thomas J StoutDepartment of Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Marc HafnerDepartment of Oncology Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-7598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in oncology drug development is to elucidate why drugs that show promising results in cancer cell lines in vitro fail in mouse studies or human trials. One of the fundamental steps toward solving this problem is to better predict how in vitro potency translates into in vivo efficacy. A common approach to infer whether a model will respond in vivo is based on in vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentration values (IC

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID35731938
PMCPMC9469692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.