Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731883›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Subcritical escape waves in schooling fish.

Winnie Poel, Bryan C Daniels, Matthew M G Sosna, Colin R Twomey, Simon P Leblanc, Iain D Couzin, Pawel Romanczuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lane formation in criss-crossing crowds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding collective behavior through neurobiology.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  15. Federated inference and belief sharing.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Inferring social influence in animal groups across multiple timescales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Winnie PoelInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1662-9087
Bryan C DanielsSchool of Complex Adaptive Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-1059
Matthew M G SosnaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-3536
Colin R TwomeyDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-2861
Simon P LeblancDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-7236
Iain D CouzinDepartment of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, D-78547 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8556-4558
Pawel RomanczukInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-998X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical physics predicts optimal information processing in living systems near transitions (or pseudo-critical points) in their collective dynamics. However, focusing on potential benefits of proximity to a critical point, such as maximal sensitivity to perturbations and fast dissemination of information, commonly disregards possible costs of criticality in the noisy, dynamic environmental contexts of biological systems. Here, we find that startle cascades in fish schools are subcritical (not maximally responsive to environmental cues) and that distance to criticality decreases when perceived risk increases. Considering individuals' costs related to two detection error types, associated to both true and false alarms, we argue that being subcritical, and modulating distance to criticality, can be understood as managing a trade-off between sensitivity and robustness according to the riskiness and noisiness of the environment. Our work emphasizes the need for an individual-based and context-dependent perspective on criticality and collective information processing and motivates future questions about the evolutionary forces that brought about a particular trade-off.

Identifiers

PMID35731883
PMCPMC9217090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.