Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731874›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Phase separation of HRLP regulates flowering time in

Yu Zhang, Sheng Fan, Changmei Hua, Zhi Wei Norman Teo, Jian Xuan Kiang, Lisha Shen, Hao Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ecological Adaptation Mechanisms Underlying Successful Plant Reproduction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. NERD-dependent mNature plants · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Enhanced HSP70 binding to mBMC plant biology · 2024
    Article
  18. NCardiovascular diabetology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-3452
Sheng FanTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore.
Changmei HuaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Zhi Wei Norman TeoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-8132
Jian Xuan KiangTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9209-2461
Lisha ShenTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1808-6370
Hao YuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9778-8855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA binding proteins mediate posttranscriptional RNA metabolism and play regulatory roles in many developmental processes in eukaryotes. Despite their known effects on the floral transition from vegetative to reproductive growth in plants, the underlying mechanisms remain largely obscure. Here, we show that a hitherto unknown RNA binding protein, hnRNP R-LIKE PROTEIN (HRLP), inhibits cotranscriptional splicing of a key floral repressor gene

Identifiers

PMID35731874
PMCPMC9217094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.