Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731858›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023

Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis.

Zena C Riddell, Carmelo Corallo, Raneem Albazaz, Kieran G Foley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction of Gallbladder Lesions Malignancy Risk Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Arrival-Time Parametric Imaging.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zena C RiddellNational Imaging Academy of Wales (NIAW), Bridgend, United Kingdom.
Carmelo CoralloDepartment of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Raneem AlbazazDepartment of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Kieran G FoleyDivision of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-1759
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.

Indexed as

Gallbladder DiseasesGallbladder NeoplasmsPolypsGallbladderHumansHyperplasiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35731858
PMCPMC9975534
OpenAlexW4283275157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.