Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731723›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Creative problem solving and facial expressions: A stage based comparison.

Mritunjay Kumar, Satyaki Roy, Braj Bhushan, Ahmed Sameer

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mritunjay KumarDepartment of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-4686
Satyaki RoyDepartment of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Braj BhushanDepartment of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5177-1209
Ahmed SameerDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wealth of research indicates that emotions play an instrumental role in creative problem-solving. However, most of these studies have relied primarily on diary studies and self-report scales when measuring emotions during the creative processes. There has been a need to capture in-the-moment emotional experiences of individuals during the creative process using an automated emotion recognition tool. The experiment in this study examined the process-related difference between the creative problem solving (CPS) and simple problem solving (SPS) processes using protocol analysis and Markov's chains. Further, this experiment introduced a novel method for measuring in-the-moment emotional experiences of individuals during the CPS and SPS processes using facial expressions and machine learning algorithms. The experiment described in this study employed 64 participants to solve different tasks while wearing camera-mounted headgear. Using retrospective analysis, the participants verbally reported their thoughts using video-stimulated recall. Our results indicate differences in the cognitive efforts spent at different stages during the CPS and SPS processes. We also found that most of the creative stages were associated with ambivalent emotions whereas the stage of block was associated with negative emotions.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionHumansMental RecallProblem SolvingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35731723
PMCPMC9216609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.