Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731591›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2022

Outcomes of incident patients treated with incremental haemodialysis as compared with standard haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

David A Jaques, Belen Ponte, Fadi Haidar, Anne Dufey, Sebastian Carballo, Sophie De Seigneux, Patrick Saudan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of incremental initiation of haemodialysis on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Incremental dialysis: two complementary views.Clinical kidney journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A JaquesDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Belen PonteDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-6050
Fadi HaidarDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne DufeyDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sebastian CarballoDivision of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sophie De SeigneuxDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrick SaudanDivision of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidual kidney function is considered better preserved with incremental haemodialysis (I-HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) as compared with conventional thrice-weekly HD (TW-HD) and is associated with improved survival. We aimed to describe outcomes of patients initiating dialysis with I-HD, TW-HD or PD.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively assembled cohort in a single university centre including all adults initiating dialysis from January 2013 to December 2020. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival and hospitalization days at 1 year, respectively.

resultsWe included 313 patients with 234 starting on HD (166 TW-HD and 68 I-HD) and 79 on PD. At the end of the study, 10 were still on I-HD while 45 transitioned to TW-HD after a mean duration of 9.8 ± 9.1 months. Patients who stayed on I-HD were less frequently diabetics (P = .007). Mean follow-up was 33.1 ± 30.8 months during which 124 (39.6%) patients died. Compared with patients on TW-HD, those on I-HD had improved survival (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.93, P = .029), while those on PD had similar survival. Initial kidney replacement therapy modality was not significantly associated with hospitalization days at 1 year.

conclusionsI-HD is suitable for selected patients starting dialysis and can be maintained for a significant amount of time before transition to TW-HD, with diabetes being a risk factor. Although hospitalization days at 1 year are similar, initiation with I-HD is associated with improved survival as compared with TW-HD or PD. Results of randomized controlled trials are awaited prior to large-scale implementation of I-HD programmes.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicPeritoneal DialysisAdultHumansRenal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyRetrospective Studiesincremental haemodialysismortalityoutcomesperitoneal dialysissurvival

Identifiers

PMID35731591
PMCPMC9681916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.