Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731425›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Behavioral evidence for two distinct memory systems in rats.

Noam Miller, Ramy Ayoub, Gehan Sentinathan, Paul E Mallet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noam MillerDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada. nmiller@wlu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-9919
Ramy AyoubDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-9284
Gehan SentinathanSocial and Psychological Foundations of Education Department, Department of Psychology, SUNY Buffalo State, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-3546
Paul E MalletDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3358-4180
Wilfrid Laurier University · CABuffalo State University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016-06138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial reaction time tasks, in which subjects have to match a target to a cue, are used to explore whether non-human animals have multiple memory systems. Predictable sub-sequences embedded in the sequence of cues are responded to faster, demonstrating incidental learning, often considered implicit. Here, we used the serial implicit learning task (SILT) to determine whether rats' memory shows similar effects. In SILT, subjects must nose-poke into a sequence of two lit apertures, S1 and S2. Some S1 are always followed by the same S2, creating predictable sequences (PS). Across groups, we varied the proportion of PS trials, from 10 to 80%, and show that rats with more PS experience do better on them than on unpredictable sequences, and better than rats with less experience. We then introduced test trials in which no S2 was cued. Rats with more PS experience did better on test trials. Finally, we reversed some sequences (from predictable to unpredictable and vice versa) and changed others. We find that rats with more PS experience perseverate on old (now incorrect) responses more than those with less PS experience. Overall, we find a discontinuity in performance as the proportion of PS increases, suggesting a switch in behavioral strategies or memory systems, which we confirm using a Process Dissociation Procedure analysis. Our data suggest that rats have at least two distinct memory systems, one of which appears to be analogous to human implicit memory and is differentially activated by varying the proportion of PS in our task.

Indexed as

LearningSerial LearningAnimalsCuesHumansRatsReaction TimeExplicit memoryImplicit memoryProcess dissociation procedure (PDP)RatSerial reaction time taskSILT

Identifiers

PMID35731425
OpenAlexW4283332716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.