Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731321›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022

Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.

Carleigh B Nesbit, Misty Blanchette-Porter, Navid Esfandiari

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carleigh B NesbitDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
Misty Blanchette-PorterDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
Navid EsfandiariDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. Navid.Esfandiari@uvmhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-5236
University of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this review is to define live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) for women ≥ 40 undergoing ovulation induction (OI)/intrauterine insemination (IUI).

methodsA systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Google Scholar. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were LBR and CPR, respectively.

resultsThere were 636 studies screened of which 42 were included. In 8 studies which provided LBR for partner sperm, LBR/cycle ranged from 0 to 8.5% with majority being ≤ 4%. Cumulative LBR was 3.6 to 7.1% over 6 cycles with the majority of pregnancies in the first 4. In the four studies providing LBR for donor sperm cycles, LBR/cycle ranged from 3 to 7% with cumulative LBR of 12 to 24% over 6 cycles. The majority of pregnancies occurred in the first 6 cycles. There were three studies with LBR or CPR/cycle ≥ 1% for women ≥ 43. No studies provided data above this range for women ≥ 45. In 4 studies which compared OI/IUI and IVF, the LBR from IVF was 9.2 to 22% per cycle. In 7 studies which compared outcomes by stimulation protocol, no significant differences were seen.

conclusionFor women ≥ 40 using homologous sperm, the highest probability of live birth is via IVF. However, if IVF is not an option, OI/IUI may be considered for up to 4 cycles in those using partner sperm or 6 cycles with donor sperm. For women > 45, OI/IUI is likely futile but a limited trial may be considered for psychological benefit while encouraging consideration of donor oocyte IVF or adoption. Use of gonadotropins does not appear to be more effective than oral agents in this age group.

Indexed as

Ovulation InductionSemenFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInseminationInsemination, ArtificialMalePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesAdvanced maternal ageAdvanced reproductive ageIntrauterine inseminationIn vitro fertilizationOvulation induction

Identifiers

PMID35731321
PMCPMC9365895
OpenAlexW4283330936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.