ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
Drainage of infected kidneys with ureteral stents: does size matter?
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of ureteral stents with different diameters to drain pus that accumulates in an obstructed kidney using an in vitro model.
methodsWe developed an in vitro model of an obstructed kidney filled with pus. The model included a silicon kidney unit based on computed tomography (CT) data, a 3D printed ureteral stone based on a real extracted ureteral stone, a latex ureter model, a bladder vessel, and a fluid with qualities resembling pus. Identical printed stones were inserted into four ureter models containing stents with varying diameters (4.8F, 6F, 7F, 8F), each of which was connected to the kidney unit and the bladder vessel. The kidney unit was filled with artificial pus to pressures of 30 cmH
resultsThe rate of pressure drop and the final pressure measured in the kidney were unaffected by the diameter of the stent. For all stent diameters, the pressure reached non-obstructed levels within 30 s, final pressure was reached within 90-120 s, and minimal amounts of pus remained in the kidney after 120 min.
conclusionsIn vitro experiments demonstrate that all stent diameters drain pus-filled, obstructed kidneys with the same efficacy. The common perception that larger diameter tubes are more effective under such circumstances should be re-examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.