Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35731198›Full record

SynthesisTrauma, violence & abuse2023

A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena.

Julia Kansok-Dusche, Cindy Ballaschk, Norman Krause, Anke Zeißig, Lisanne Seemann-Herz, Sebastian Wachs, Ludwig Bilz

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The influence of hate speech on adolescents' bystander intention and TNB aggression.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Kansok-DuscheDepartment of Health Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-4027
Cindy BallaschkDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-6123
Norman KrauseDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6909-9403
Anke ZeißigDepartment of Health Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-2429
Lisanne Seemann-HerzDepartment of Health Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4004-1400
Sebastian WachsDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-6646
Ludwig BilzDepartment of Health Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-0492
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the current state of research on the involvement of young people in hate speech. Thus, this systematic review presents findings on a) the prevalence of hate speech among children and adolescents and on hate speech definitions that guide prevalence assessments for this population; and b) the theoretical and empirical overlap of hate speech with related concepts. This review was guided by the Cochrane approach. To be included, publications were required to deal with real-life experiences of hate speech, to provide empirical data on prevalence for samples aged 5 to 21 years and they had to be published in academic formats. Included publications were full-text coded using two raters (κ = .80) and their quality was assessed. The string-guided electronic search (ERIC, SocInfo, Psycinfo, Psyndex) yielded 1,850 publications. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and their findings were systematized. Twelve publications were of medium quality due to minor deficiencies in their theoretical or methodological foundations. All studies used samples of adolescents and none of younger children. Nine out of 10 studies applied quantitative methodologies. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies were included. Results showed that frequencies for hate speech exposure were higher than those related to victimization and perpetration. Definitions of hate speech and assessment instruments were heterogeneous. Empirical evidence for an often theorized overlap between hate speech and bullying was found. The paper concludes by presenting a definition of hate speech, including implications for practice, policy, and research.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsAdolescentChildHateHumansPrevalenceSpeechadolescentsbullyingchildrenhate speechsystematic reviewyouth

Identifiers

PMID35731198
PMCPMC10486144
OpenAlexW4283319036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.