Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730950›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Environmental Perturbations during the Rehabilitation of Wild Migratory Birds Induce Gut Microbiome Alteration and Antibiotic Resistance Acquisition.

Hyokeun Song, Saehah Yi, Woo-Hyun Kim, Jae-Ho Guk, Minjong Ha, Insik Kwak, Janghee Han, Seong-Chan Yeon, Seongbeom Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial Resistance inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hyokeun SongCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Saehah YiCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Woo-Hyun KimCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae-Ho GukCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Minjong HaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Insik KwakCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Janghee HanCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong-Chan YeonCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.
Seongbeom ChoCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National Universitygrid.31501.36, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8385-181X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild migratory birds are essential for sustaining healthy ecosystems, but the effects of a rehabilitation period on their gut microbiomes are still unclear. Here, we performed longitudinal sampling, 16S rRNA sequencing, and antibiotic resistance monitoring of the gut microbiome of six species of wild migratory birds protected as natural monuments in South Korea that are subject to short- or long-term rehabilitation periods. Overall, gut microbiome diversity was significantly decreased in the early stages of rehabilitation, and it did not recover to a level comparable to that of wild birds. Moreover, while the abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria decreased, that of zoonotic pathogens increased, indicating rehabilitation-induced dysbiosis. The metabolic pathways involved in the degradation of aromatic pollutants were significantly downregulated, suggesting the depletion of pollutant-degrading microorganisms. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli significantly increased during rehabilitation, particularly ciprofloxacin and tetracycline resistance, and seven of the rehabilitated wild birds acquired multidrug resistance. The diet and habitat changes experienced by wild migratory birds during rehabilitation may have induced the observed gut microbiome dysbiosis and acquisition of antibiotic resistance. These rehabilitation-induced alterations might affect the adaptability of wild birds to their natural environments and contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance after their release.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnimals, WildAnti-Bacterial AgentsBirdsDrug Resistance, MicrobialDysbiosisEcosystemRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibiotic resistancedysbiosismicrobiotarehabilitationwild birds

Identifiers

PMID35730950
PMCPMC9430529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.