Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730877›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2022

SURGICAL TREATMENT IN CLINICAL STAGE IV GASTRIC CANCER: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PROCEDURES AND SURVIVAL OUTCOMES.

Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos, Marina Alessandra Pereira, André Roncon Dias, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Erica Sakamoto, Ulysses Ribeiro-Jr, Bruno Zilberstein, Sérgio Carlos Nahas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Surgical treatment of perforated gastric tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX IN GASTRIC CANCER AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER ACCORDING TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY UNIT: ANALYSIS OF 33,774 PATIENTS OVER TWO DECADES.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. TUMOR MARKERS EXPRESSION LEVELS IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENT'S PERIPHERAL BLOOD BY RT-PCR ASSESSMENT.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. PALLIATIVE GASTRECTOMY VERSUS GASTRIC BYPASS FOR SYMPTOMATIC CLINICAL STAGE IV GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. OLIGOMETASTASIS IN GASTRIC CANCER TREATMENT: IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE SURGEON?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GASTRIC CANCER WITH PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS: STUDY PROTOCOL OF A PHASE II TRIAL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. STAGING LAPAROSCOPY IS STILL A VALUABLE TOOL FOR OPTIMAL GASTRIC CANCER MANAGEMENT.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. LAPAROSCOPIC PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT WITH RECTUS SHEATH TUNNELING: A ONE-PORT SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille RamosCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-7858
Marina Alessandra PereiraCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-0988
André Roncon DiasCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-4916
Tiago Biachi de CastriaCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-2485
Erica SakamotoCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-0730
Ulysses Ribeiro-JrCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-7347
Bruno ZilbersteinCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-8558
Sérgio Carlos NahasCancer Institute, Hospital de Clínicas, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-4146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimEven in clinical stage IV gastric cancer (GC), surgical procedures may be required to palliate symptoms or in an attempt to improve survival. However, the limited survival of these patients raises doubts about who really had benefits from it. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes in stage IV GC treated with surgical procedures without curative intent.

methodsRetrospective analyses of patients with stage IV GC submitted to surgical procedures including tumor resection, bypass, jejunostomy, and diagnostic laparoscopy were performed. Patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy served as the comparison group.

resultsSurgical procedures in clinical stage IV were performed in 363 patients. Compared to curative surgery (680 patients), stage IV patients had a higher rate of comorbidities and ASA III/IV classification. The surgical procedures that were performed included 107 (29.4%) bypass procedures (partitioning/gastrojejunal anastomosis), 85 (23.4%) jejunostomies, 76 (20.9%) resections, and 76 (20.9%) diagnostic laparoscopies. Regarding patients' characteristics, resected patients had more distant metastasis (p=0.011), bypass patients were associated with disease in more than one site (p<0.001), and laparoscopy patients had more peritoneal metastasis (p<0.001). According to the type of surgery, the median overall survival was as follows: resection (13.6 months), bypass (7.8 months), jejunostomy (2.7 months), and diagnostic (7.8 months, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, low albumin levels, in case of more than one site of disease, jejunostomy, and laparoscopy, were associated with worse survival.

conclusionStage IV resected cases have better survival, while patients submitted to jejunostomy and diagnostic laparoscopy had the worst results. The proper identification of patients who would benefit from surgical resection may improve survival and avoid futile procedures.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansJejunostomyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID35730877
PMCPMC9254395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.