Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730716›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2022

Beyond patient classification: the "hidden" face of nursing workload.

João Lucas Campos de Oliveira, Danielle Fabiana Cucolo, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, Marcia Galan Perroca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Demonstration of sizing nursing staff methods in intensive care.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João Lucas Campos de OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Nursing School, Graduate Program in Nursing, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-2360
Danielle Fabiana CucoloPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-1192
Ana Maria Müller de MagalhãesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Nursing School, Graduate Program in Nursing, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-7306
Marcia Galan PerrocaFaculdade de Medicina de Rio Preto, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2931-8429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a theoretical-reflective essay, which aimed to reflect on the centralization of Patient Classification Systems in workload and hospital nursing staff sizing. The reflexive interpretations were guided by two axes: Patient Classification Systems : constitution and utilities; and "Hidden" nursing activities in workload measurement. The first evidences the importance and the role of these instruments in workload identification and in hospital nursing staff sizing, exemplifying several possibilities to be used by nurses. On the other hand, with the second axis, it is clear that there are many nursing activities that are not sensitive to the application (even if systematic) of these means of patient assessment. Therefore, nursing workload measurement may be underestimated. It was inferred that the complexity of practice environments requires a macro and micro institutional look at the nursing workload measurement, especially when considered for workforce planning/sizing purposes.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalWorkloadHumansPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35730716
PMCPMC10081636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.