SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of antidepressants on motor and functional recovery in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of modified Soyo-san (Xiao-yao-san, Shoyo-san) combined with antidepressants on post-stroke depression and functional recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Short-term Exposure to Air Pollution and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Herbal medicine as adjunctive therapy with antidepressants for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Early emotional interventions for post-stroke functional prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Escitalopram promotes recovery from hand paresis in cortical sensori-motor stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled longitudinal study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- The safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression: a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke depression: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Factors associated with antidepressant use following hospitalization for acute stroke.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2026Article
- Neurotransmitters' white matter mapping unveils the neurochemical fingerprints of stroke.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Systematic Scoping Review of Measures Used to Evaluate Treatment-Induced Changes in Depression, Anxiety, and Chronic Stress in People with Post-Stroke Aphasia.Aphasiology · 2025Article
- Assessing the effects of antidepressant use on stroke recurrence and related outcomes in ischemic stroke patients: a propensity score matched analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacotherapy in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Paradigm Shift from Disease Management to Functional Enhancement.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2025Article
- Increased central serotonergic activity in patients after an acute ischemic stroke. An EEG study.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Article
- Propranolol as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Post-Stroke Anxiety: A Clinical Review and Future Directions.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Dementia after Ischemic Stroke, from Molecular Biomarkers to Therapeutic Options.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Nanocarrier drug delivery system: promising platform for targeted depression therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Several studies investigated the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving poststroke recovery; thus, we have decided to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs in poststroke recovery. Methods and Results In this meta-analysis we searched the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The studies were included if they were placebo-controlled trials in design and reported SSRIs' effects on poststroke depression, anxiety, disability, dependence, motor abilities, and cognitive functions. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The search yielded 44 articles that included 16 164 patients, and about half of the participants were treated with SSRIs. Our results showed that SSRIs had a significant effect on preventing depression (weighted mean difference [WMD], -7.05 [95% CI, -11.78 to -2.31]), treating depression according to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (WMD, -1.45 [95% CI, -2.77 to -0.14]), anxiety (relative risk, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]), dependence (WMD, 8.86 [95% CI, 1.23-16.48]), motor abilities according to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (WMD, -0.79 [95% CI, -1.42 to -0.15]), and cognitive functions (WMD, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.12-1.89]). On the other hand, no significant effect of SSRIs on disability was observed. Additionally, we found that treating with SSRIs increased the risk of seizures (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.13-1.83]), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms or bleeding between SSRIs and a placebo. Conclusions Our study showed that SSRIs are effective in preventing and treating depression, and improving anxiety, motor function, cognitive function, and dependence in patients after stroke. These benefits were only reproducible with the citalopram subanalysis but not fluoxetine. Further well-conducted placebo-controlled trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of citalopram among patients after stroke. Registration URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021285766.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.