Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730598›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Health State Utility Values in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Raed A Joundi, Joel Adekanye, Alexander A Leung, Paul Ronksley, Eric E Smith, Alexander D Rebchuk, Thalia S Field, Michael D Hill, Stephen B Wilton, Lauren C Bresee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health state utility values in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparing Quality of Life in Smell and Taste Disorders With Other Chronic Conditions-A Narrative Review.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Review
  12. Rapid Access Atrial Fibrillation Clinics in Australia - Modelling Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Article
  13. Trends in cardiometabolic disease and health-related quality of life in the United States, 2001-2022.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Informing decisions in light of parameter uncertainty - an economic evaluation of the adjuvanted recombinant herpes zoster vaccine in Sweden.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for aortic stenosis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raed A JoundiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-0701
Joel AdekanyeUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Alexander A LeungUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-8497
Paul RonksleyUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3958-7561
Eric E SmithUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-1668
Alexander D RebchukUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5553-346X
Thalia S FieldUniversity of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-0633
Michael D HillUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-1543
Stephen B WiltonUniversity of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-312X
Lauren C BreseeDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-9612

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Health state utility values are commonly used to provide summary measures of health-related quality of life in studies of stroke. Contemporaneous summaries are needed as a benchmark to contextualize future observational studies and inform the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving post-stroke quality of life. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of the literature using Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science from January 1995 until October 2020 using search terms for stroke, health-related quality of life, and indirect health utility metrics. We calculated pooled estimates of health utility values for EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, AQoL, HUI2, HUI3, 15D, and SF-6D using random effects models. For the EQ-5D-3L we conducted stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression by key subgroups. We screened 14 251 abstracts and 111 studies met our inclusion criteria (sample size range 11 to 12 447). EQ-5D-3L was reported in 78% of studies (study n=87; patient n=56 976). The pooled estimate for EQ-5D-3L at ≥3 months following stroke was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67), which was ≈20% below population norms. There was high heterogeneity (I

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStrokeFemaleHealth StatusHumansPsychometricsQuality Indicators, Health CareSurveys and Questionnaireshealth‐related quality of lifemeta‐analysisquality of lifestroke

Identifiers

PMID35730598
PMCPMC9333363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.