Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730402›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2022

Experimental and computational studies of cellulases as bioethanol enzymes.

Shrivaishnavi Ranganathan, Sankar Mahesh, Sruthi Suresh, Ayshwarya Nagarajan, Taner Z Sen, Ragothaman M Yennamalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shrivaishnavi RanganathanDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, India.
Sankar MaheshDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-6087
Sruthi SureshDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, India.
Ayshwarya NagarajanDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, India.
Taner Z SenS. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research UnitU., California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5553-6190
Ragothaman M YennamalliDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Chemical and Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-8835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioethanol industries and bioprocesses have many challenges that constantly impede commercialization of the end product. One of the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry is the challenge of discovering highly efficient catalysts that can improve biomass conversion. The current promising bioethanol conversion catalysts are microorganism-based cellulolytic enzymes, but lack optimization for high bioethanol conversion, due to biological and other factors. A better understanding of molecular underpinnings of cellulolytic enzyme mechanisms and significant ways to improve them can accelerate the bioethanol commercial production process. In order to do this, experimental methods are the primary choice to evaluate and characterize cellulase's properties, but they are time-consuming and expensive. A time-saving, complementary approach involves computational methods that evaluate the same properties and improves our atomistic-level understanding of enzymatic mechanism of action. Theoretical methods in many cases have proposed research routes for subsequent experimental testing and validation, reducing the overall research cost. Having a plethora of tools to evaluate cellulases and the yield of the enzymatic process will aid in planning more optimized experimental setups. Thus, there is a need to connect the computational evaluation methods with the experimental methods to overcome the bottlenecks in the bioethanol industry. This review discusses various experimental and computational methods and their use in evaluating the multiple properties of cellulases.

Indexed as

CellulasesBiofuelsBiomassCelluloseHydrolysisBiofuelsCellulasesCellulosebiofuelCellulasecomputational methodspretreatment processproperty evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35730402
PMCPMC9345620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.