Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730259›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2022

Pretransplant kidney transcriptome captures intrinsic donor organ quality and predicts 24-month outcomes.

Kellie J Archer, Elissa Bardhi, Daniel G Maluf, Jennifer McDaniels, Thomas Rousselle, Anne King, James D Eason, Lorenzo Gallon, Enver Akalin, Thomas F Mueller and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Signatures as Guide to Kidney Prognosis in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kellie J Archer *Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Elissa Bardhi *Surgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2229-3150
Daniel G MalufDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-4834
Jennifer McDanielsSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Thomas RousselleSurgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anne KingDivision of Nephrology, Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
James D EasonJames D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Lorenzo GallonDepartment of Medicine-Nephrology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Enver AkalinKidney Transplant Program, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1341-5144
Thomas F Mueller *Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Valeria R Mas *Surgical Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Assessment of Donor Quality for Improving Kidney Transplant OutcomesR01DK109581 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kellie J. Archer, Valeria Raquel Mas · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Dissecting the role of dynamic epigenome prompting pathways leading to kidney allograft fibrosisR01DK122682 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI MAS, VALERIA RAQUEL · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109581NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of novel prognostic tools derived from omics technologies, transplant medicine is entering the era of precision medicine. Currently, there are no established predictive biomarkers for posttransplant kidney function. A total of 270 deceased donor pretransplant kidney biopsies were collected and posttransplant function was prospectively monitored. This study first assessed the utility of pretransplant gene expression profiles in predicting 24-month outcomes in a training set (n = 174). Nearly 600 differentially expressed genes were associated with 24-month graft function. Grafts that progressed to low function at 24 months exhibited upregulated immune responses and downregulated metabolic processes at pretransplantation. Using penalized logistic regression modeling, a 55 gene model area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for 24-month graft function was 0.994. Gene expression for a subset of candidate genes was then measured in an independent set of pretransplant biopsies (n = 96) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The AUROC when using 13 genes with three donor characteristics (age, race, body mass index) was 0.821. Subsequently, a risk score was calculated using this combination for each patient in the validation cohort, demonstrating the translational feasibility of using gene markers as prognostic tools. These findings support the potential of pretransplant transcriptomic biomarkers as novel instruments for improving posttransplant outcome predictions and associated management.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTranscriptomeBiomarkersHumansKidneyTissue DonorsBiomarkersbiomarkerclinical decision-makingdonors and donation: deceasedgenomicsglomerular filtration rate (GFR)kidney transplantation/nephrologytranslational research/science

Identifiers

PMID35730259
PMCPMC9710201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.