Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730177›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

Light flashes and the geometry of specular fish schools.

Assaf Pertzelan, Gil Ariel, Moshe Kiflawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Humpback whale (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Light flashes and the geometry of specular fish schools.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Assaf PertzelanFaculty of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University, PO Box 653, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5612-6820
Gil ArielDepartment of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52000, Israel.
Moshe KiflawiFaculty of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University, PO Box 653, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-6486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of predation presents a difficult challenge in environments that offer no physical shelter, such as the open waters of the world's seas. In the absence of hiding places, many marine fishes turn to two main anti-predator strategies: aggregation and camouflage, which, mostly, have been studied separately. Here, we consider both aspects together and examine the visual imprint of fish schools of different sizes and geometries, given that camouflage is attained by specular (mirror-like) skin texture. To do so, we developed ray-tracing simulations that model the passage of sunbeams as they go through an optically realistic aquatic environment and reflect off the skins of the fish. We find that due to frequent high-intensity specular reflections (light flashes), the marginal increase in detectability with increasing school size is significantly higher than previously estimated under the assumption of diffusive reflection. However, we also find that by increasing density and alignment the fish can mitigate the detectability of individuals, albeit at the expense of the detectability of the school as a whole. Our findings provide a new perspective on documented responses to threat by schooling pelagic fishes and underscore the importance of the optical signature of animals in structuring their behaviour.

Indexed as

FishesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsOceans and SeasSchoolsflashesgeometryspecular

Identifiers

PMID35730177
PMCPMC9214278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.