Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730171›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

Charting the twist-to-bend ratio of plant axes.

Steve Wolff-Vorbeck, Olga Speck, Max Langer, Thomas Speck, Patrick W Dondl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Charting the twist-to-bend ratio of plant axes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steve Wolff-VorbeckDepartment for Applied Mathematics, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Olga SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group @ Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8705-5121
Max LangerPlant Biomechanics Group @ Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1652-0185
Thomas SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group @ Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-2636
Patrick W DondlDepartment for Applied Mathematics, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-7230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the evolution of land plants many body plans have been developed. Differences in the cross-sectional geometry and tissue pattern of plant axes influence their flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity and the ratio of both of these rigidities, the so-called twist-to-bend ratio. For comparison, we have designed artificial cross-sections with various cross-sectional geometries and patterns of vascular bundles, collenchyma or sclerenchyma strands, but fixed percentages for these tissues. Our mathematical model allows the calculation of the twist-to-bend ratio by taking both cross-sectional geometry and tissue pattern into account. Each artificial cross-section was placed into a rigidity chart to provide information about its twist-to-bend ratio. In these charts, artificial cross-sections with the same geometry did not form clusters, whereas those with similar tissue patterns formed clusters characterized by vascular bundles, collenchyma or sclerenchyma arranged as one central strand, as a peripheral closed ring or as distributed individual strands. Generally, flexural rigidity increased the more the bundles or fibre strands were placed at the periphery. Torsional rigidity decreased the more the bundles or strands were separated and the less that they were arranged along a peripheral ring. The calculated twist-to-bend ratios ranged between 0.85 (ellipse with central vascular bundles) and 196 (triangle with individual peripheral sclerenchyma strands).

Indexed as

Models, Theoreticalbending modulusfinite-element methodflexural rigiditytorsional modulustorsional rigiditytwist-to-bend ratio

Identifiers

PMID35730171
PMCPMC9214286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.