ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022
Charting the twist-to-bend ratio of plant axes.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distortion in LPBF Cantilevers Governed by Stiffness-Controlled Stress Redistribution.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A 2D model to study how secondary growth affects the self-supporting behaviour of climbing plants.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Conjoining Trees for the Provision of Living Architecture in Future Cities: A Long-Term Inosculation Study.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Charting the twist-to-bend ratio of plant axes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the evolution of land plants many body plans have been developed. Differences in the cross-sectional geometry and tissue pattern of plant axes influence their flexural rigidity, torsional rigidity and the ratio of both of these rigidities, the so-called twist-to-bend ratio. For comparison, we have designed artificial cross-sections with various cross-sectional geometries and patterns of vascular bundles, collenchyma or sclerenchyma strands, but fixed percentages for these tissues. Our mathematical model allows the calculation of the twist-to-bend ratio by taking both cross-sectional geometry and tissue pattern into account. Each artificial cross-section was placed into a rigidity chart to provide information about its twist-to-bend ratio. In these charts, artificial cross-sections with the same geometry did not form clusters, whereas those with similar tissue patterns formed clusters characterized by vascular bundles, collenchyma or sclerenchyma arranged as one central strand, as a peripheral closed ring or as distributed individual strands. Generally, flexural rigidity increased the more the bundles or fibre strands were placed at the periphery. Torsional rigidity decreased the more the bundles or strands were separated and the less that they were arranged along a peripheral ring. The calculated twist-to-bend ratios ranged between 0.85 (ellipse with central vascular bundles) and 196 (triangle with individual peripheral sclerenchyma strands).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.