Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730115›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2022

Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Brandon G Smith, Stasa Tumpa, Orla Mantle, Charlotte J Whiffin, Harry Mee, Davi J Fontoura Solla, Wellingson S Paiva, Virginia F J Newcombe, Angelos G Kolias, Peter J Hutchinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brandon G SmithDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stasa TumpaSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Orla MantleGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte J WhiffinNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Harry MeeDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Davi J Fontoura SollaNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Wellingson S PaivaNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Virginia F J NewcombeUniversity Division of Anesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Angelos G KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter J HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of "telemedicine," "TBI," "outcome assessment," and "patient-generated health data." Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%,

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticTelemedicineFollow-Up StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTechnologyfollow-up technologyinnovationoutcome assessmentpatient-generated health datatelemedicinetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35730115
PMCPMC9529313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.