Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35730040›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of data science and analytics2023

Data-driven analytics of COVID-19 'infodemic'.

Minyu Wan, Qi Su, Rong Xiang, Chu-Ren Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of data science and analytics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minyu WanDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0083-5895
Qi SuSchool of Foreign Languages, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Rong XiangDepartment of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chu-Ren HuangDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rampant of COVID-19 infodemic has almost been simultaneous with the outbreak of the pandemic. Many concerted efforts are made to mitigate its negative effect to information credibility and data legitimacy. Existing work mainly focuses on fact-checking algorithms or multi-class labeling models that are less aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the language. Nor is it discussed how such representations can account for the common psycho-socio-behavior of the information consumers. This work takes a data-driven analytical approach to (1) describe the prominent lexical and grammatical features of COVID-19 misinformation; (2) interpret the underlying (psycho-)linguistic triggers in terms of sentiment, power and activity based on the affective control theory; (3) study the feature indexing for anti-infodemic modeling. The results show distinct language generalization patterns of misinformation of favoring evaluative terms and multimedia devices in delivering a negative sentiment. Such appeals are effective to arouse people's sympathy toward the vulnerable community and foment their spreading behavior.

Indexed as

COVID-19 InfodemicEvaluation–potency–activityInformation credibilityLinguistic featuresMisinformation

Identifiers

PMID35730040
PMCPMC9194350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.