Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729952›Full record

ArticleSoft computing2022

Automating fake news detection using PPCA and levy flight-based LSTM.

Dheeraj Kumar Dixit, Amit Bhagat, Dharmendra Dangi

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Soft computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dheeraj Kumar DixitDepartment of Computer Applications, MANIT, Bhopal, India.
Amit BhagatDepartment of Computer Applications, MANIT, Bhopal, India.
Dharmendra DangiDepartment of Computer Applications, MANIT, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, rumours and fake news are spreading widely and very rapidly all over the world. Such circumstances lead to the propagation and production of an inaccurate news article. Also, misinformation and fake news are increased by the user without proper verification. Hence, it is necessary to restrict the spreading of fake information on mass media and to promote confidence all over the world. For this purpose, this paper recognizes the detection of fake news in an effective manner. The proposed methodology in detecting fake news consists of four different phases namely the data pre-processing phase, feature reduction phase, feature extraction phase as well as the classification phase. During data pre-processing, the input data are pre-processed by employing tokenization, stop-words deletion as well as stemming. In the second phase, the features are reduced by employing PPCA to enhance accuracy. Then the extracted feature is provided to the classification phase where LSTM-LF algorithm is utilized to classify the news as fake or real optimally. Furthermore, this paper utilizes four different datasets namely the Buzzfeed dataset, GossipCop dataset, ISOT dataset as well as Politifact dataset for evaluation. The performance evaluation and the comparative analysis are conducted and the analysis reveals that the proposed approach provides better performances when compared to other fake detection-based approaches.

Indexed as

ClassificationExtractionFake newsLF distributionLSTMPPCAPre-processingReduction

Identifiers

PMID35729952
PMCPMC9202495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.