Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729896›Full record

ArticleZentralblatt fur Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie2022

[Return to work of employees after a mental disorder].

Jessica Scharf, Adrian Loerbroks, Peter Angerer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zentralblatt fur Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica ScharfInstitut für Arbeits‑, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Adrian LoerbroksInstitut für Arbeits‑, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Peter AngererInstitut für Arbeits‑, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Returning to work often fails due to conflicting expectations and goals of the stakeholders involved. Due to their medical expertise and workplace-related knowledge, occupational physicians could effectively promote mutual understanding and cooperation between the stakeholders. The study aimed to develop a manual and training session for its application that will support occupational physicians to assume a mediating role in the integration of employees with a mental illness. Methods: Based on a literature review and extensive qualitative preliminary work on the expectations of the stakeholders, the manual and training materials were developed, discussed and revised in several consecutive steps based on a participatory approach with occupational physicians and other experts. Finally, occupational physicians were trained to use the manual during their specialization training in order to subsequently test its practicability in everyday work. Results: The manual presents information on the potentially different expectations of the actors for the return process and offers comprehensive advice for the mediating work of the occupational physicians. After a manualized training of approximately 2h, 9 out of 37 participants used the manual for return interviews within 4 months and 6 out of 9 rated it as helpful. Conclusion: The first positive experiences of using the material developed with the target group justify a larger interventional study to investigate the presumed beneficial effects on the success of reintegration.

Indexed as

GuidelinesMental disorderOccupational physicianParticipatory developmentReturn to work management

Identifiers

PMID35729896
PMCPMC9188830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.