Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729804›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2022

Action guidance for addressing pollution from inhalational anaesthetics.

J A Devlin-Hegedus, F McGain, R D Harris, J D Sherman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Increasing the environmental sustainability of operating rooms in Canada: an evidence-informed guideline for policy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Environmental impact of anesthetic gases.Medical gas research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring sevoflurane consumption and COJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
  13. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J A Devlin-HegedusDepartment of Anaesthesia, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-0866
F McGainDepartments of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1977-9072
R D HarrisSchool of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J D ShermanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4157-9728
The University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AUYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is a real and accelerating existential danger. Urgent action is required to halt its progression, and everyone can contribute. Pollution mitigation represents an important opportunity for much needed leadership from the health community, addressing a threat that will directly and seriously impact the health and well-being of current and future generations. Inhalational anaesthetics are a significant contributor to healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions and minimising their climate impact represents a meaningful and achievable intervention. A challenge exists in translating well-established knowledge about inhalational anaesthetic pollution into practical action. CODA is a medical education and health promotion charity that aims to deliver climate action-oriented recommendations, supported by useful resources and success stories. The CODA-hosted platform is designed to maximise engagement of the global healthcare community and draws upon diverse experiences to develop global solutions and accelerate action. The action guidance for addressing pollution from inhalational anaesthetics is the subject of this article. These are practical, evidence-based actions that can be undertaken to reduce the impact of pollution from inhalational anaesthetics, without compromising patient care and include: removal of desflurane from drug formularies; decommissioning central nitrous oxide piping; avoidance of nitrous oxide use; minimising fresh gas flows during anaesthesia; and prioritising total intravenous anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia when clinically safe to do so. Guidance on how to educate, implement, measure and review progress on these mitigation actions is provided, along with means to share successes and contribute to the essential, global transition towards environmentally sustainable anaesthesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthesia, InhalationHumansNitrous OxideAnesthetics, InhalationNitrous Oxideclimate changeenvironmentinhaled anaestheticpollutionsustainability

Identifiers

PMID35729804
PMCPMC9543086
OpenAlexW4283315753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.