Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729677›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems.

Jennifer R Weinert-Nelson, Amy S Biddle, Carey A Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distribution and prevalence ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dietary Energy Sources Affect Cecal and Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metagenetic Analysis of the Pregnant Microbiome in Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer R Weinert-NelsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. jennifer.weinert@rutgers.edu.
Amy S BiddleDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19711, USA.
Carey A WilliamsDepartment of Animal Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1003557New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station NJ06170Northeast SARE gne17-162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiet is a key driver of equine hindgut microbial community structure and composition. The aim of this study was to characterize shifts in the fecal microbiota of grazing horses during transitions between forage types within integrated warm- (WSG) and cool-season grass (CSG) rotational grazing systems (IRS). Eight mares were randomly assigned to two IRS containing mixed cool-season grass and one of two warm-season grasses: bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] or crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.]. Fecal samples were collected during transitions from CSG to WSG pasture sections (C-W) and WSG to CSG (W-C) on days 0, 2, 4, and 6 following pasture rotation and compared using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

resultsRegardless of IRS or transition (C-W vs. W-C), species richness was greater on day 4 and 6 in comparison to day 0 (P < 0.05). Evenness, however, did not differ by day. Weighted UniFrac also did not differ by day, and the most influential factor impacting β-diversity was the individual horse (R

conclusionsOverall, these results demonstrated a strong influence of individual horse on the fecal microbial community, particularly on the specific composition of fiber-degraders. The equine fecal microbiota were largely stable across transitions between forages within IRS suggesting that the equine gut microbiota adjusted at the individual level to the subtle dietary changes imposed by these transitions. This adaptive capacity indicates that horses can be managed in IRS without inducing gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Indexed as

Equine foragesEquine microbiomeHorse grazingWarm-season grasses

Identifiers

PMID35729677
PMCPMC9210719
OpenAlexW4283206780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.