Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729666›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

Leveling up evidence syntheses: filling conceptual gaps of the role of midwifery in health systems through a network analysis.

Cristina A Mattison, Kirsty Bourret, Michelle L Dion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina A MattisonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, 2Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Solna, 171 77, Sweden. cristina.mattison@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-0690
Kirsty BourretDepartment of Women and Children's Health, 2Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Solna, 171 77, Sweden.
Michelle L DionDepartment of Political Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, KTH-533, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the research note, our main objective is to explore the value of combining an evidence synthesis with a network analysis. The discussion is based on a critical interpretive synthesis, which combines systematic review methodology with qualitive inquiry, and 'research concept' network analysis focused on understanding the roles of midwives in health systems. The interpretative analytic approach of a critical interpretive synthesis has a high explanatory value by allowing for the review of a diverse body of literature and is well-suited to delving into areas that are not well understood, such as midwifery.

resultsNetwork analyses use graphs to represent relationships between concepts and brought to light important additional insights into the literature that were not present in the evidence synthesis alone. Given the lack of theoretical development in the area of midwifery in health systems, the critical interpretive synthesis allowed for the generation of concepts used to inform a theoretical framework, while the novel application of an exploratory network analysis deepened understanding of conceptual areas of saturation within the field, as well as identifying critical gaps in the literature.

Indexed as

MidwiferyFemaleHumansPregnancyCritical interpretive synthesisEvidence synthesisHealth policyHealth systemsMidwiferyMixed methodsNetwork analysisSexual and reproductive health and rights

Identifiers

PMID35729666
PMCPMC9210622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.