Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729664›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Evaluating the mechanisms and long-term effects of a web-based comprehensive sexual health and media literacy education program for young adults attending community college: study protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial.

Tracy M Scull, Christina V Dodson, Reina Evans-Paulson, Liz C Reeder, Jacob Geller, Kathryn N Stump, Janis B Kupersmidt

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tracy M ScullInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA. tscull@irtinc.us.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-8654
Christina V DodsonInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-0004
Reina Evans-PaulsonInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7397-6969
Liz C ReederInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.
Jacob GellerInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.
Kathryn N StumpInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.
Janis B KupersmidtInnovation Research & Training, 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 125, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-2610

Funding

Mechanisms of Media Literacy Education for Promoting Relationship Health in Older AdolescentsR01HD099134 · NICHD · INNOVATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING, INC. · PI SCULL, TRACY MARIE · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD099134NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany community college students experience poor sexual and relationship health outcomes. Young adults consume a plethora of media content, much of which depicts unhealthy sexual and romantic relationships, and research has shown that media exposure can negatively impact health outcomes. Asynchronous, web-based media literacy education (MLE) programs have been shown to improve short-term sexual and relationship health outcomes. However, there is a dearth of research on the mechanisms by which MLE programs impact health outcomes and the long-term effects of MLE programs on sexual and relationship health outcomes among community college students.

methodsThis study will (1) evaluate the unique effects of MLE on primary and secondary sexual and relationship health outcomes; (2) compare the mechanisms underlying the effects of an asynchronous, web-based MLE sexual health program (Media Aware) to the mechanisms underlying the effects of an active control program on health outcomes; and (3) evaluate the long-term efficacy of Media Aware on media literacy skills and sexual and relationship health outcomes compared to active control and delayed intervention control groups. To address these aims, a three-arm randomized controlled trial with young adults attending community college will be conducted. It is expected that around 30 campuses will participate and approximately 67 students from each campus will be enrolled in the study (estimated n = 2010). Campuses will be randomized to either the (1) intervention group (Media Aware); (2) active control group (sexual health education from Media Aware without MLE content or methods); or (3) delayed intervention control group. Students will complete online questionnaires at pretest, posttest, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups. DISCUSSION: This project has the potential to advance theory about the potential mechanisms through which MLE has an impact on sexual and relationship health outcomes by directly testing the impact of interventions using a randomized design. Additionally, this study is expected to establish strong evidence for the effectiveness of Media Aware for use with young adults and to help identify strategies to optimize the longer-term impact of the program on health. Students' satisfaction with programming will be discussed to inform future implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Sexual HealthHumansInternetLiteracyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex EducationUniversitiesYoung AdultAdolescent healthCommunity collegeMedia literacy educationSexual healthSexual violence preventionWeb-based learning

Identifiers

PMID35729664
PMCPMC9210582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.