Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729615›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water.

Ashraf Al-Ashhab, Rivka Alexander-Shani, Yosef Avrahami, Roberto Ehrlich, Rosa Ines Strem, Shiri Meshner, Noam Shental, Galit Sharon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ashraf Al-Ashhab *Dead Sea and Arava Science Center, 8698000, Masada, Israel. ashraf.ashhab@gmail.com.
Rivka Alexander-ShaniDead Sea and Arava Science Center, 8698000, Masada, Israel.
Yosef AvrahamiDead Sea and Arava Science Center, 8698000, Masada, Israel.
Roberto EhrlichIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research Ltd., The National Center for Mariculture, Eilat, Israel.
Rosa Ines StremIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research Ltd., The National Center for Mariculture, Eilat, Israel.
Shiri MeshnerDead Sea and Arava Science Center, 8698000, Masada, Israel.
Noam ShentalComputer Science Department, The Open University of Israel, Rehovot, Israel.
Galit Sharon *Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research Ltd., The National Center for Mariculture, Eilat, Israel. galshar70@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3716-2279
Dead Sea and Arava Science Center · ILIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research · ILBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILOpen University of Israel · IL

Funding

ICA Foundation; JCA charitable association 709 and 793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe welfare of farmed fish is influenced by numerous environmental and management factors. Fish skin is an important site for immunity and a major route by which infections are acquired. The objective of this study was to characterize bacterial composition variability on skin of healthy, diseased, and recovered Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) and Barramundi (Lates calcarifer). S. aurata, which are highly sensitive to gram-negative bacteria, were challenged with Vibrio harveyi. In addition, and to provide a wider range of infections, both fish species (S. aurata and L. calcarifer) were infected with gram-positive Streptococcus iniae, to compare the response of the highly sensitive L. calcarifer to that of the more resistant S. aurata. All experiments also compared microbial communities found on skin of fish reared in UV (a general practice used in aquaculture) and non-UV treated water tanks.

resultsSkin swab samples were taken from different areas of the fish (lateral lines, abdomen and gills) prior to controlled infection, and 24, 48 and 72 h, 5 days, one week and one-month post-infection. Fish skin microbial communities were determined using Illumina iSeq100 16S rDNA for bacterial sequencing. The results showed that naturally present bacterial composition is similar on all sampled fish skin sites prior to infection, but the controlled infections (T

conclusionsOur experimental findings shed light on the fish skin microbiota in relation to fish survival (in diseased and healthy conditions). The results can be harnessed to provide management tools for commercial fish farmers; predicting and preventing fish diseases can increase fish health, welfare, and enhance commercial fish yields.

Indexed as

Bacterial fish diseasesFish microbiomeFish skinLates calcariferSparus aurata

Identifiers

PMID35729615
PMCPMC9210813
OpenAlexW4283220767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.