Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729526›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2022

Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yan-Cun Liu, Ying Yao, Mu-Ming Yu, Yu-Lei Gao, An-Long Qi, Tian-Yu Jiang, Zhen-Sen Chen, Song-Tao Shou, Yan-Fen Chai

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan-Cun Liu *Department of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China. yancunliu@tmu.edu.cn.
Ying Yao *Department of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Mu-Ming Yu *Department of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Yu-Lei GaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
An-Long QiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Tian-Yu JiangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Zhen-Sen ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Song-Tao ShouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Yan-Fen ChaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Tianjin, 300052, China. chaiyanfen2012@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81601714National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by infection, is a major public health problem. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and mortality of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in China.

methodsWe Searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from 1 January 1992 to 1 June 2020 for studies that reported on the frequency and mortality of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock conducted in China. Random effects models were performed to estimate the pooled frequency and mortality of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock.

resultsOur search yielded 846 results, of which 29 studies were included in this review. The pooled frequency of sepsis was estimated at 33.6% (95% CI 25.9% to 41.3%, I

conclusionsOur findings indicated that the frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China were much higher than North America and Europe countries. Based on our results, an extremely high incidence and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China's mainland requires more healthcare budget support. Epidemiological data on sepsis and septic shock in ED are severely lacking, and more research is urgently needed in this area. Trial registration This systematic review was conducted according to the statement of the preferred reporting items for systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021243325) and the meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P).

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticChinaHumansChinaFrequencyMeta-analysisMortalitySepsis

Identifiers

PMID35729526
PMCPMC9210671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.