Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729502›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2022

Virtual Reality for Pain Relief in the Emergency Room (VIPER) - a prospective, interventional feasibility study.

T Birrenbach, F Bühlmann, A K Exadaktylos, W E Hautz, M Müller, T C Sauter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of virtual reality and podcasts for improving patient experience during colposcopy: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transforming Chronic Pain Care Through Telemedicine: An Italian Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T BirrenbachDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. Tanja.Birrenbach@insel.ch.
F BühlmannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
A K ExadaktylosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
W E HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
M Müller *Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
T C Sauter *Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is one of the most common, yet challenging problems leading to emergency department (ED) presentation, despite the availability of a wide range of pharmacological therapies. Virtual reality (VR) simulations are well studied in a wide variety of clinical settings, including acute and chronic pain management, as well as anxiety disorders. However, studies in the busy environment of an adult ED are scarce. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a VR simulation for pain and anxiety control in a convenience sample of adult ED patients presenting with traumatic and non-traumatic pain triaged 2-5 (i.e., urgent to non-urgent) with a pain rating of ≥ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10).

methodsProspective within-subject, repeated measures interventional feasibility pilot study at a Swiss University ED. The intervention consisted of a virtual reality simulation in addition to usual care. Pain and anxiety levels were measured using a verbally administered numeric rating scale (NRS) before and after the intervention. Information on patient experience was collected using established rating scales.

resultsFifty-two patients were enrolled. The most common pain localisations were extremities (n = 15, 28.8%) and abdomen (n = 12, 23.1%). About one third of patients presented with trauma-associated pain (n = 16, 30.8%). Duration of pain was mainly acute (< 24 h) (n = 16, 30.8%) or subacute (> 24 h) (n = 32, 61.5%). The majority of patients were triage category 3, i.e. semi-urgent (n = 48, 92.3%). Significant reduction in pain (NRS median pre-VR simulation 4.5 (IQR 3-7) vs. median post-VR simulation 3 (IQR 2-5), p < 0.001), and anxiety levels (NRS median pre-VR simulation 4 (IQR 2-5) vs. median post-VR simulation 2 (IQR 0-3), p < 0.001) was achieved, yielding moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen's d estimate for pain reduction = 0.59 (95% CI 0.19-0.98), for anxiety level on NRS = 0.75 (95% CI 0.34-1.15). With medium immersion and good tolerability of the VR simulation, user satisfaction was high.

conclusionsVirtual reality analgesia for pain and anxiety reduction in the busy setting of an ED is feasible, effective, with high user satisfaction. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to better characterize its impact on pain perception and resource utilization.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementVirtual RealityAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesHumansPainPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAnxietye-HealthEmergency departmentPain managementTelehealthTelemedicineVirtual reality simulation

Identifiers

PMID35729502
PMCPMC9210626
OpenAlexW4283219222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.