ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022
Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Clustering in Aqueous Glycine Solutions.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment and Optimization of Force Fields for Glycine Polymorphism and Solution Properties.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Visualising reaction complexes in amine-based unloaded and CONature communications · 2026Article
- Orientational Behavior and Vibrational Response of Glycine at Aqueous Interfaces.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024Article
- Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Giant Clustering in Small-Molecule Solutions: The Case of Aqueous PEHA.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent experiments with undersaturated aqueous glycine solutions have repeatedly exhibited the presence of giant liquid-like clusters or nanodroplets around 100 nm in diameter. These nanodroplets re-appear even after careful efforts for their removal and purification of the glycine solution. The composition of these clusters is not clear, although it has been suggested that they are mainly composed of glycine, a small and very soluble amino acid. To gain insights into this phenomenon, we study the aggregation of glycine in aqueous solutions at concentrations below the experimental solubility limit using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations under ambient conditions. Three protonation states of glycine (zwitterion = GLZ, anion = GLA, and cation = GLC) are simulated using molecular force fields based on the 1.14*CM1A partial charge scheme, which incorporates the OPLS all-atom force field and TIP3P water. When initiated from dispersed states, we find that giant clusters do not form in our simulations unless salt impurities are present. Moreover, if simulations are initiated from giant cluster states, we find that they tend to dissolve in the absence of salt impurities. Therefore, the simulation results provide little support for the possibility that the giant clusters seen in experiments are composed purely of glycine (and water). Considering that strenuous efforts are made in experiments to remove impurities such as salt, we propose that the giant clusters observed might instead result from the aggregation of reaction products of aqueous glycine, such as diketopiperazine or other oligoglycines which may be difficult to separate from glycine using conventional methods, or their co-aggregation with glycine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.