ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2022
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) Screening in Arizona: Lessons Learned from the First 2 Years.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in the NHS newborn blood spot screening programme: a systematic review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Novel Synonymous Variant in IL7R Causes Preferential Expression of the Soluble Isoform.Journal of clinical immunology · 2024Article
- Severe Combined Immunodeficiency-Classification, Microbiology Association and Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incidence of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the USA was reported as 1 in 58,000 live births. In Arizona, it was anticipated that newborn screening would identify two to four cases of SCID per year. This estimate did not consider ethnic nuances in Arizona, with higher percentages of Native American and Hispanic populations compared to national percentages. The true incidence of SCID and non-SCID T cell lymphopenia has not previously been reported in Arizona.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on all abnormal SCID newborn screening (NBS) tests in Arizona from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, using data from the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Phoenix Children's Hospital's electronic medical record [IRB# 20-025].
resultsSeven infants were diagnosed with SCID, yielding an incidence of 1 in 22,819 live births. Four of these infants had Artemis-type SCID. Thirteen infants were identified with an abnormal initial NBS which ultimately did not lead to a diagnosis of SCID. Four of these infants were diagnosed with congenital syndromes associated with T cell lymphopenia. Infants of Hispanic ethnicity were over-represented in this cohort.
conclusionOver 2 years, NBS in Arizona confirmed an incidence more than 2.5 times that reported nationally. This increased incidence is likely reflective of Arizona's unique population profile, with a higher percentage of Native American population. The findings in our non-SCID cohort are in alignment with previously published data, except for an increased percentage of infants of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, possibly reflecting Arizona's increased percentage of Hispanic/Latino population compared to the general US population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.