Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729472›Full record

SynthesisEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

Disordered eating and the meat-avoidance spectrum: a systematic review and clinical implications.

Courtney P McLean, Jayashri Kulkarni, Gemma Sharp

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney P McLeanMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University, 4/607 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Courtney.mclean@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3896-2419
Jayashri KulkarniMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University, 4/607 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Gemma SharpMonash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Monash University, 4/607 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMeat avoidance has long been thought to be related to eating psychopathology; however, research does not necessarily support this notion. Furthermore, commonly used eating disorder scales may be picking up on normal meat-avoiding behaviours in vegetarians and vegans. As such, we systematically reviewed the association between vegetarianism, veganism, and disordered eating, and reviewed the psychometric properties of eating disorder scales for use in these populations.

methodsWe searched electronic databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL for literature published until June 2021.

resultsForty-eight studies met eligibility criteria, with no consensus as to whether meat avoidance was associated with higher rates of disordered eating. Most studies reported a significant positive association with both vegetarianism and veganism, and orthorexia nervosa. Six studies provided evidence for the use of eating disorder measures in vegetarians and vegans, reporting poor psychometric fit among all scales.

conclusionThis systematic review highlights the extent to which vegetarians and vegans have been highly understudied, with limited research suggesting higher levels of orthorexia nervosa behaviours in vegetarians and vegans. Furthermore, our results provide tentative evidence that the factorial validity of commonly used eating disorder scales, such as the EDE-Q, may be poor in vegans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersDiet, VeganHumansMeatVegansVegetariansEating disordersOrthorexia nervosaPsychometric propertiesVeganismVegetarianism

Identifiers

PMID35729472
PMCPMC9556390
OpenAlexW4283206917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.