Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729468›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2022

Collection of Data on Adverse Events Related to Medicinal Products: A Survey Among Registries in the ENCePP Resources Database.

Kelly Plueschke, Carla Jonker, Valerie Strassmann, Xavier Kurz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacoepidemiology: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly PlueschkeData Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Kelly.plueschke@ema.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1824-4148
Carla JonkerData Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Valerie StrassmannData Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xavier KurzData Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
European Medicines Agency · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs patient registries are not subject to regulatory requirements on the collection of adverse events (AEs) related to medicinal products, they may not have foreseen the collection of such information on a routine basis or as part of specific data collection schemes.

objectiveThe European Medicines Agency conducted a survey among registries to better understand their approach towards the collection, management and reporting of AEs related to medicines.

methodAn online survey composed of 15 questions was distributed in May 2020 to registries listed in the European Network of Centres in Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) resources database for completion by August 2020. Aggregated results are presented in this paper.

resultsOne third of the registries completed the survey (31/85; 36.5%). Most of the respondents routinely collect information on medicines (29/31; 93.5%), out of which 65.5% (19/29) also collect data on AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Frequencies and timelines for collecting and reporting AEs/ADRs vary widely across registries, as does their level of experience in providing data to third parties for regulatory purposes.

conclusionsThe low response rate may indicate little interest in this topic or that registries were not originally developed for routine data collection on AEs/ADRs and, ultimately, monitoring of the safety of medicines. Results indicate that clear guidance on the collection and use of real-world data in regulatory frameworks and strengthened collaboration between registry holders, academia, regulators and medicines developers are needed to achieve comprehensive and high levels of quality of safety data captured by registries to support regulatory decision making. These will hopefully be enabled by the European Medicines Regulatory Network strategy to 2025.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansPharmacoepidemiologyRegistriesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35729468
PMCPMC9296377
OpenAlexW4283262737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.