Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Comparison of DNA preservation between ribs and vertebrae.

Laura Božič, Tajda Benedik Bevc, Eva Podovšovnik, Tomaž Zupanc, Irena Zupanič Pajnič

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Božič *Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tajda Benedik Bevc *Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eva PodovšovnikOrthopedic Hospital of Valdoltra, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Tomaž ZupancInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Irena Zupanič PajničInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. irena.zupanic@mf.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-015X
University of Ljubljana · SIOrthopaedic Hospital Valdoltra · SI

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS J3-3080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of skeletal element types and their intra-bone parts is important because of differences in DNA preservation, and this must be considered when sampling bones for DNA testing. When incomplete skeletons are found, ribs and vertebrae have been shown to be the most suitable for genetic identification of bones from the torso. This study compares the preservation of DNA between 12th thoracic vertebrae and first ribs to determine which bone type is more suitable for genetic typing. The study analyzed 35 12th thoracic vertebrae and 29 first ribs from one mass grave from the Second World War with commingled skeletal remains excavated. Bone DNA preservation was estimated by measuring nuclear DNA concentration and its degradation and through short tandem repeat (STR) typing success. Previous studies performed on aged skeletal remains have shown that the DNA content of the first ribs and 12th thoracic vertebrae has high intra-bone variability, and this was considered when sampling the bones. After full demineralization extraction, the PowerQuant System (Promega) was used to measure the quantity and quality of DNA, and the GlobalFiler kit (Applied Biosystems) was used for STR typing. The results showed that DNA yield and degradation and STR typing success exhibited no statistically significant difference between first ribs and 12th thoracic vertebrae, and there was no intra-individual difference when comparing only paired bones from the same individuals. Consequently, with intra-bone DNA variability considered, the first ribs or the 12th thoracic vertebrae can be selected when sampling to genetically identify the skeletal remains of highly degraded torsos. HIGHLIGHTS: The first ribs and thoracic vertebrae are the most suitable bones for sampling from the torso. The proximal part of first rib and posterior vertebral column of the 12th thoracic vertebrae yielded the most DNA. The first ribs were compared with the 12th thoracic vertebrae, and the sampling process considered intra-bone DNA variability. The quality and quantity of nuclear DNA and success of STR typing were measured. The first ribs yielded the same DNA yields as well as STR typing success as the 12th thoracic vertebrae. When only the torso is present, it is not of high importance whether the first ribs or the 12th thoracic vertebrae are collected.

Indexed as

Body RemainsDNA FingerprintingAgedDNAHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsRibsSpineThoracic VertebraeDNABone samplingFirst ribMissing person identificationSecond World WarSTR typingThoracic vertebra

Identifiers

PMID35729437
OpenAlexW4283278371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.