Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729417›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2022

Emergency transanal total mesorectal excision for perforated rectal cancer: a two-case series.

Hiroya Enomoto, Katsuhito Suwa, Nana Takeuchi, Yuhei Tsukazaki, Takuro Ushigome, Tomoyoshi Okamoto, Ken Eto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroya EnomotoDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan. h.enomoto@jikei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-082X
Katsuhito SuwaDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Nana TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Yuhei TsukazakiDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Takuro UshigomeDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Tomoyoshi OkamotoDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Ken EtoDepartment of Surgery, The Jikei University Hospital, 3-25-8 Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
The Jikei University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP 21H03244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery for perforated rectal cancer is technically difficult because of paralytic dilatation due to generalized fecal peritonitis, the presence of a bulky tumor, and fecal retention due to obstruction. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is the latest minimally invasive transanal technique pioneered to facilitate difficult pelvic dissections. It can provide a good surgical field linearly from the perineal side and reduce manipulations from the intraabdominal side. Here, we present two cases of emergency TaTME performed for perforated rectal cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: The patients were a 38-year-old female and a 75-year-old male. They were diagnosed with perforated rectal cancer and were in a state of septic shock. Emergency Hartmann's procedure was performed in both cases. Intraoperative findings showed fecal contamination of the entire abdomen and dilated intestines and bulky tumors with perforation. The female patient had multiple uterine fibroids, and the male patient had an enlarged prostate. For both patients, dissection of the mesorectum to the anal side of the tumor and transection of the rectum on the anal side of the tumor via a linear stapler were considered difficult because of the insufficient surgical field of view into the pelvis. Therefore, a two-team approach with TaTME was adopted. En bloc resection of the rectum was completed by collaboration of the abdominal team and the transanal team, and the autonomic nerves were successfully preserved. Finally, the specimens were resected, and the anal edge of the rectum was closed with a purse-string suture by the transanal team. Although these two cases were emergency surgeries in difficult situations, the cancer lesions were successfully and safely removed without involvement of the resection margin.

conclusionsThis is the first report of emergency TaTME. Although these cases were emergency operations in a situation where it was difficult to pursue radical resection-and often times in these situations, the operation may end with only stoma creation-the specimens were safely resected. Emergency TaTME is a useful procedure for treatment of perforated rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Perforated colorectal cancerRectal cancerTaTME

Identifiers

PMID35729417
PMCPMC9213589
OpenAlexW4283260486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.