Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Psychometric properties of the emotional processing scale in individuals with psychiatric symptoms and the development of a brief 15-item version.

Daniel Maroti, Erland Axelsson, Brjánn Ljótsson, Gerhard Andersson, Mark A Lumley, Robert Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel MarotiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden. daniel.maroti@ki.se.
Erland AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brjánn LjótssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mark A LumleyDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Robert JohanssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 25-item Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) can be used with clinical populations, but there is little research on its psychometric properties (factor structure, test-retest reliability, and validity) in individuals with psychiatric symptoms. We administered the EPS-25 to a large sample of people (N = 512) with elevated psychiatric symptoms. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate three a priori models from previous research and then evaluated discriminant and convergent validity against measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionaire-9), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). None of the a priori models achieved acceptable fit, and subsequent exploratory factor analysis did not yield a clear factor solution for the 25 items. A 5-factor model did, however, achieve acceptable fit when we retained only 15 items, and this solution was replicated in a validation sample. Convergent and discriminant validity for this revised version, the EPS-15, was r = - 0.19 to 0.46 vs. TAS-20, r = 0.07- 0.25 vs. PHQ-9, and r = 0.29- 0.57 vs. GAD-7. Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.73). This study strengthens the case for the reliability and validity of the 5-factor structure of the EPS but suggest that only 15 items should be retained. Future studies should further examine the reliability and validity of the EPS-15.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsPatient Health QuestionnaireFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35729355
PMCPMC9213431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.