ArticleScientific reports2022
Artificial neural network model with different backpropagation algorithms and meteorological data for solar radiation prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated QSAR, Molecular Docking, ADMET Profiling, and Antioxidant Evaluation of Substituted Chromone and Aryloxyalkanoic Acid Derivatives as Potential CysLTPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing solar photovoltaic energy production prediction using diverse machine learning models tuned with the chimp optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A memetic dynamic coral reef optimisation algorithm for simultaneous training, design, and optimisation of artificial neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An innovative machine learning based on feed-forward artificial neural network and equilibrium optimization for predicting solar irradiance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Lung Cancer by PET-CT.Cancer management and research · 2024Review
- Solar irradiation prediction using empirical and artificial intelligence methods: A comparative review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- A novel framework for the evaluation of coastal protection schemes through integration of numerical modelling and artificial intelligence into the Sand Engine App.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solar energy serves as a great alternative to fossil fuels as they are clean and renewable energy. Accurate solar radiation (SR) prediction can substantially lower down the impact cost pertaining to the development of solar energy. Lately, many SR forecasting system has been developed such as support vector machine, autoregressive moving average and artificial neural network (ANN). This paper presents a comprehensive study on the meteorological data and types of backpropagation (BP) algorithms used to train and develop the best SR predicting ANN model. The meteorological data, which includes temperature, relative humidity and wind speed are collected from a meteorological station from Kuala Terrenganu, Malaysia. Three different BP algorithms are employed into training the model i.e., Levenberg-Marquardt, Scaled Conjugate Gradient and Bayesian Regularization (BR). This paper presents a comparison study to select the best combination of meteorological data and BP algorithm which can develop the ANN model with the best predictive ability. The findings from this study shows that temperature and relative humidity both have high correlation with SR whereas wind temperature has little influence over SR. The results also showed that BR algorithm trained ANN models with maximum R of 0.8113 and minimum RMSE of 0.2581, outperform other algorithm trained models, as indicated by the performance score of the respective models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.