Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729285›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022

Tooth abnormalities associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gabriela Fonseca-Souza, Luiza Becker de Oliveira, Letícia Maira Wambier, Rafaela Scariot, Juliana Feltrin-Souza

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors associated with single versus multiple supernumerary teeth in a paediatric population: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Cleft lip and palate are associated with a higher prevalence of molar-incisor hypomineralisation: a cross-sectional study with a comparison group.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriela Fonseca-SouzaDepartment of Stomatology, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Setor de Ciências da Saúde, Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner 632, Curitiba, State of Paraná, 80210-17080210-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-8553
Luiza Becker de OliveiraDepartment of Stomatology, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Setor de Ciências da Saúde, Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner 632, Curitiba, State of Paraná, 80210-17080210-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-8409
Letícia Maira WambierSchool of Health and Biological Sciences, Universidade Positivo, Street Prof. Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza 5300, Curitiba, PR, 81280-330, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-0406
Rafaela ScariotDepartment of Stomatology, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Setor de Ciências da Saúde, Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner 632, Curitiba, State of Paraná, 80210-17080210-170, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-6413
Juliana Feltrin-SouzaDepartment of Stomatology, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Setor de Ciências da Saúde, Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner 632, Curitiba, State of Paraná, 80210-17080210-170, Brazil. julianafeltrin1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-3721
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Positivo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between orofacial clefts (OFC) and tooth abnormalities (TA).

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and BBO, and in the gray literature and selected observational studies that evaluated the association between TA and OFC. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing the presence and absence of OFC, cleft type-cleft palate (CP) and cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P)-and cleft laterality-unilateral and bilateral. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

resultsA total of 99 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 37 were included in the meta-analysis. Only four studies were classified as low risk of bias. Significant associations were observed between the presence of OFC and tooth agenesis (OR = 19.46; 95%CI = 4.99-75.96), supernumerary teeth (OR = 4.04; 95%CI = 1.26-12.99), developmental defects of enamel (OR = 3.15; 95%CI = 1.28-7.80), microdontia (OR = 15.57; 95%CI = 1.06-228.51), and taurodontism (OR = 1.74; 95%CI = 1.74-2.86). Individuals with CP had a lower frequency of supernumerary teeth (OR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.08-0.64), peg-shaped tooth (OR = 0.31; 95%CI = 0.12-0.80), and morphological TA (OR = 0.13; 95%CI = 0.04-0.45) than individuals with CL/P. No TA was significantly associated with cleft laterality (p > 0.05). The quality of the evidence was very low in all analyses.

conclusionIndividuals with OFC had a higher frequency of TA than those without OFC. Individuals with CP had a lower frequency of TA than individuals with CL/P. No TA was associated to cleft laterality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Help to identify the treatment needs of individuals affected by OFC, improving the services provided to this population.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateTooth AbnormalitiesTooth, SupernumeraryHumansCleft lipCleft palateCongenital abnormalitiesCraniofacial abnormalitiesTooth abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID35729285
OpenAlexW4283268027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.