Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729284›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Strain-specific effects of probiotic Lactobacilli on mRNA expression of epigenetic modifiers in intestinal epithelial cells.

Ankita Kumari, Shalaka Bhawal, Suman Kapila, Rajeev Kapila

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankita KumariDivision of Animal Biochemistry, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7556-8459
Shalaka BhawalDivision of Animal Biochemistry, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7527-4127
Suman KapilaDivision of Animal Biochemistry, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2627-773X
Rajeev KapilaDivision of Animal Biochemistry, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. rkapila69@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-3720
National Dairy Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epigenome of an organism is as important as the genome for the normal development and functioning of an individual. The human epigenome can be affected by various environmental factors including nutrients, microbiota and probiotics through epigenetic modifiers and mediates various health-promoting effects. The present study was aimed to explore the temporal changes in DNA and histone modifiers (DNMT1, TET2, p300, HDAC1, KMT2A, KDM5B, EzH2 and JMJD3) in intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) by probiotic lactobacilli (Limosilactobacillus fermentum MTCC 5898 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MTCC 5897) in comparison to opportunistic commensal pathogen Escherichia coli (ATCC 14849). Cells were treated separately with probiotic strains and E. coli for different durations and temporal changes in gene expression among DNA and histone modifiers were measured. Time-dependent studies showed that L. fermentum enhanced the transcription of epigenetic modifiers at 12 h of treatment (P < 0.05) contrary to E. coli which reduced the expression of these genes during the same duration of treatment. On the other hand, probiotic L. rhamnosus was not able to induce any significant changes in gene expression of these modifiers. Furthermore, during the exclusion of E. coli by L. fermentum, the probiotic was found to resist the changes made by E. coli in the transcription of some of the epigenetic modifiers. Thus, it is concluded that the probiotics modulated the mRNA expression of DNA and histone modifiers contrarily to E. coli in a strain-specific manner.

Indexed as

LactobacillusProbioticsCaco-2 CellsEpigenesis, GeneticEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliHistonesHumansRNA, MessengerHistonesRNA, MessengerCaco-2DNA modifiersE. coliHistone modifiersLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID35729284
OpenAlexW4283268411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.