Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Mapping immunogenic epitopes of an adhesin-like protein from Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 and comparison of empirical data with in silico prediction methods.

Sofia Khanum, Vincenzo Carbone, Sandeep K Gupta, Juliana Yeung, Dairu Shu, Tania Wilson, Natalie A Parlane, Eric Altermann, Silvia M Estein, Peter H Janssen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sofia KhanumAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand. sofia.khanum@agresearch.co.nz.
Vincenzo CarboneAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Sandeep K GuptaAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Juliana YeungAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Dairu ShuAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Tania WilsonAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Natalie A ParlaneAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Eric AltermannAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Silvia M EsteinCentro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN), UNCPBA-CONICET-CICPBA, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Campus Universitario, 7000, Tandil, Argentina.
Peter H JanssenAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
D Neil WedlockAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Axel HeiserAgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZCentro Científico Tecnológico - Tandil · ARRiddet Institute · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico prediction of epitopes is a potentially time-saving alternative to experimental epitope identification but is often subject to misidentification of epitopes and may not be useful for proteins from archaeal microorganisms. In this study, we mapped B- and T-cell epitopes of a model antigen from the methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1, the Big_1 domain (AdLP-D1, amino acids 19-198) of an adhesin-like protein. A series of 17 overlapping 20-mer peptides was selected to cover the Big_1 domain. Peptide-specific antibodies were produced in mice and measured by ELISA, while an in vitro splenocyte re-stimulation assay determined specific T-cell responses. Overall, five peptides of the 17 peptides were shown to be major immunogenic epitopes of AdLP-D1. These immunogenic regions were examined for their localization in a homology-based model of AdLP-D1. Validated epitopes were found in the outside region of the protein, with loop like secondary structures reflecting their flexibility. The empirical data were compared with epitope predictions made by programmes based on a range of algorithms. In general, the epitopes identified by in silico predictions were not comparable to those determined empirically.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialMethanobrevibacterAlgorithmsAnimalsEpitope MappingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteMicePeptidesAdhesins, BacterialEpitopes, T-LymphocytePeptides

Identifiers

PMID35729277
PMCPMC9213418
OpenAlexW4283204690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.