Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A functional definition to distinguish ponds from lakes and wetlands.

David C Richardson, Meredith A Holgerson, Matthew J Farragher, Kathryn K Hoffman, Katelyn B S King, María B Alfonso, Mikkel R Andersen, Kendra Spence Cheruveil, Kristen A Coleman, Mary Jade Farruggia and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

David C Richardson *Biology Department, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, NY, USA. richardsond@newpaltz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9374-9624
Meredith A Holgerson *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2275-9240
Matthew J FarragherSchool of Biology and Ecology, Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-8436
Kathryn K HoffmanDepartments of Biology and Environmental Studies, St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-8269
Katelyn B S KingDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-842X
María B AlfonsoInstituto Argentino de Oceanografía (IADO), Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)-CONICET, Florida 8000, Complejo CCT CONICET Bahía Blanca, Edificio E1, B8000BFW, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-8098
Mikkel R AndersenCentre for Freshwater and Environmental Studies, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Dundalk, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-2894
Kendra Spence CheruveilDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife and the Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1880-2880
Kristen A ColemanDepartment of Geography, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mary Jade FarruggiaDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4234-6678
Rocio Luz FernandezNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Cordoba, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-8975
Kelly L HondulaBattelle, National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1928-1442
Gregorio A López Moreira MazacotteDepartment of Ecohydrology and Biogeochemistry, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9023-5177
Katherine PaulBiology Department, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, NY, USA.
Benjamin L PeierlsLakes Environmental Association, Bridgton, ME, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-7195
Joseph S RabaeyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-4855
Steven SadroDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6416-3840
María Laura SánchezCONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5831-1811
Robyn L SmythEnvironmental and Urban Studies, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8513-008X
Jon N SweetmanDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Penn State University, University College, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-7355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ponds are often identified by their small size and shallow depths, but the lack of a universal evidence-based definition hampers science and weakens legal protection. Here, we compile existing pond definitions, compare ecosystem metrics (e.g., metabolism, nutrient concentrations, and gas fluxes) among ponds, wetlands, and lakes, and propose an evidence-based pond definition. Compiled definitions often mentioned surface area and depth, but were largely qualitative and variable. Government legislation rarely defined ponds, despite commonly using the term. Ponds, as defined in published studies, varied in origin and hydroperiod and were often distinct from lakes and wetlands in water chemistry. We also compared how ecosystem metrics related to three variables often seen in waterbody definitions: waterbody size, maximum depth, and emergent vegetation cover. Most ecosystem metrics (e.g., water chemistry, gas fluxes, and metabolism) exhibited nonlinear relationships with these variables, with average threshold changes at 3.7 ± 1.8 ha (median: 1.5 ha) in surface area, 5.8 ± 2.5 m (median: 5.2 m) in depth, and 13.4 ± 6.3% (median: 8.2%) emergent vegetation cover. We use this evidence and prior definitions to define ponds as waterbodies that are small (< 5 ha), shallow (< 5 m), with < 30% emergent vegetation and we highlight areas for further study near these boundaries. This definition will inform the science, policy, and management of globally abundant and ecologically significant pond ecosystems.

Indexed as

PondsWetlandsEcosystemLakesWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID35729265
PMCPMC9213426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.