Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729253›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Multi-task learning to leverage partially annotated data for PPI interface prediction.

Henriette Capel, K Anton Feenstra, Sanne Abeln

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henriette CapelBioinformatics Section VU, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-5313
K Anton FeenstraBioinformatics Section VU, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-9667
Sanne AbelnBioinformatics Section VU, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.abeln@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-7174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein protein interactions (PPI) are crucial for protein functioning, nevertheless predicting residues in PPI interfaces from the protein sequence remains a challenging problem. In addition, structure-based functional annotations, such as the PPI interface annotations, are scarce: only for about one-third of all protein structures residue-based PPI interface annotations are available. If we want to use a deep learning strategy, we have to overcome the problem of limited data availability. Here we use a multi-task learning strategy that can handle missing data. We start with the multi-task model architecture, and adapted it to carefully handle missing data in the cost function. As related learning tasks we include prediction of secondary structure, solvent accessibility, and buried residue. Our results show that the multi-task learning strategy significantly outperforms single task approaches. Moreover, only the multi-task strategy is able to effectively learn over a dataset extended with structural feature data, without additional PPI annotations. The multi-task setup becomes even more important, if the fraction of PPI annotations becomes very small: the multi-task learner trained on only one-eighth of the PPI annotations-with data extension-reaches the same performances as the single-task learner on all PPI annotations. Thus, we show that the multi-task learning strategy can be beneficial for a small training dataset where the protein's functional properties of interest are only partially annotated.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35729253
PMCPMC9213449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.