Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35729196›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Patterns of social mixing in England changed in line with restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to April 2022).

Louise E Smith, Henry W W Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T Fear, Susan Michie, G James Rubin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louise E SmithInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. louise.e.smith@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2564
Henry W W PottsInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-8804
Richard AmlȏtNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-6588
Nicola T FearInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-2925
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-6378
G James RubinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-0570
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBDefence Science and Technology Laboratory · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social mixing contributes to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We developed a composite measure for risky social mixing, investigating changes during the pandemic and factors associated with risky mixing. Forty-five waves of online cross-sectional surveys were used (n = 78,917 responses; 14 September 2020 to 13 April 2022). We investigated socio-demographic, contextual and psychological factors associated with engaging in highest risk social mixing in England at seven timepoints. Patterns of social mixing varied over time, broadly in line with changes in restrictions. Engaging in highest risk social mixing was associated with being younger, less worried about COVID-19, perceiving a lower risk of COVID-19, perceiving COVID-19 to be a less severe illness, thinking the risks of COVID-19 were being exaggerated, not agreeing that one's personal behaviour had an impact on how COVID-19 spreads, and not agreeing that information from the UK Government about COVID-19 can be trusted. Our composite measure for risky social mixing varied in line with restrictions in place at the time of data collection, providing some validation of the measure. While messages targeting psychological factors may reduce higher risk social mixing, achieving a large change in risky social mixing in a short space of time may necessitate a reimposition of restrictions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesGovernmentHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35729196
PMCPMC9212204
OpenAlexW4283259348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.