ArticleScientific reports2022
Single trait versus principal component based association analysis for flowering related traits in pigeonpea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide identification and gene expression analysis of AhNHXs in peanut.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- QTL mapping of vernalization-insensitive and photoperiod-independent early flowering in yellow lupin (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Identification of best housekeeping gene for normalization in qRT-PCR data under different development stages and stress conditions in Vigna mungo.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Next-generation translational genomics for developing future crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Beyond the Standard GWAS-A Guide for Plant Biologists.Plant & cell physiology · 2025Review
- Constitutive expression ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Article
- Dissecting genomic regions and candidate genes for pod borer resistance and component traits in pigeonpea minicore collection.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genetic Potential of Newly Developed Maize Hybrids under Different Water-Availability Conditions in an Arid Environment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring genetic diversity and ascertaining genetic loci associated with important fruit quality traits in apple (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023Article
- Whole chloroplast genome-specific non-synonymous SNPs reveal the presence of substantial diversity in the pigeonpea mini-core collection.3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Identification of novel putative alleles related to important agronomic traits of wheat using robust strategies in GWAS.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genome-wide association study as a powerful tool for dissecting competitive traits in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Determination of traits responding to iron toxicity stress at different stages and genome-wide association analysis for iron toxicity tolerance in rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic basis of brace root angle and diameter in maize.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pigeonpea, a tropical photosensitive crop, harbors significant diversity for days to flowering, but little is known about the genes that govern these differences. Our goal in the current study was to use genome wide association strategy to discover the loci that regulate days to flowering in pigeonpea. A single trait as well as a principal component based association study was conducted on a diverse collection of 142 pigeonpea lines for days to first and fifty percent of flowering over 3 years, besides plant height and number of seeds per pod. The analysis used seven association mapping models (GLM, MLM, MLMM, CMLM, EMLM, FarmCPU and SUPER) and further comparison revealed that FarmCPU is more robust in controlling both false positives and negatives as it incorporates multiple markers as covariates to eliminate confounding between testing marker and kinship. Cumulatively, a set of 22 SNPs were found to be associated with either days to first flowering (DOF), days to fifty percent flowering (DFF) or both, of which 15 were unique to trait based, 4 to PC based GWAS while 3 were shared by both. Because PC1 represents DOF, DFF and plant height (PH), four SNPs found associated to PC1 can be inferred as pleiotropic. A window of ± 2 kb of associated SNPs was aligned with available transcriptome data generated for transition from vegetative to reproductive phase in pigeonpea. Annotation analysis of these regions revealed presence of genes which might be involved in floral induction like Cytochrome p450 like Tata box binding protein, Auxin response factors, Pin like genes, F box protein, U box domain protein, chromatin remodelling complex protein, RNA methyltransferase. In summary, it appears that auxin responsive genes could be involved in regulating DOF and DFF as majority of the associated loci contained genes which are component of auxin signaling pathways in their vicinity. Overall, our findings indicates that the use of principal component analysis in GWAS is statistically more robust in terms of identifying genes and FarmCPU is a better choice compared to the other aforementioned models in dealing with both false positive and negative associations and thus can be used for traits with complex inheritance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.