Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35728906›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Association between retinal markers and cognition in older adults: a systematic review.

Varshanie Jeevakumar, Rebekah Sefton, Joyce Chan, Bamini Gopinath, Gerald Liew, Tejal M Shah, Joyce Siette

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reexamine the link between retinal layer thickness and cognitive function after correction of axial length: the Beijing Eye Study 2011.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Varshanie JeevakumarAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebekah SeftonAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.
Joyce ChanNew Look Eyewear, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia.
Bamini GopinathDepartment of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-359X
Gerald LiewCentre for Vision Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-0012
Tejal M ShahMacquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Joyce SietteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia joyce.siette@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-5847
Macquarie University · AUAustralian Hearing · AUThe University of Sydney · AUVision Eye Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo appraise the existing literature reporting an association between retinal markers and cognitive impairment in adults aged 65 years and over and to provide directions for future use of retinal scanning as a potential tool for dementia diagnosis.

designSystematic review of peer-reviewed empirical articles investigating the association of retinal markers in assessing cognitive impairment. DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases, Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched from inception until March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All empirical articles in English investigating the association between retinal markers and cognition in humans aged ≥65 years using various retinal scanning methodologies were included. Studies with no explicit evaluation of retinal scanning and cognitive outcomes were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was conducted by two authors (VJ, RS) and reviewed by another author (JS). Results were synthesised and described narratively.

resultsSixty-seven eligible studies examining 6815 older adults were included. Majority of studies were cross-sectional (n=60; 89.6%). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was the most commonly used retinal scanning methodology to measure the thickness of retinal nerve fibre layer, the ganglion cell complex, choroid and macula. 51.1% of cross-sectional studies using OCT reported an association between the thinning of at least one retinal parameter and poor cognition. Longitudinal studies (n=6) using OCT also mostly identified significant reductions in retinal nerve fibre layer thickness with cognitive decline. Study quality was overall moderate.

conclusionRetinal nerve fibre layer thickness is linked with cognitive performance and therefore may have the potential to detect cognitive impairment in older adults. Further longitudinal studies are required to validate our synthesis and understand underlying mechanisms before recommending implementation of OCT as a dementia screening tool in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176757.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedCognitionHumansRetinaTomography, Optical Coherencedementiahaematologymedical ophthalmologyneuro-ophthalmologyophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID35728906
PMCPMC9214387
OpenAlexW4283259588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.