Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35728899›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Psychosocial determinants of adherence to public health and social measures (PHSMs) in 18 African Union Member States during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a cross-sectional survey.

Nandita Murukutla, Ashish K Gupta, Meena Maharjan, Cecilia Fabrizio, Emily W Myers, Andrew Johnson, Virginia Nkwanzi, Colby A Wilkason, Natalie Lacey, Akhona Tshangela and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nandita MurukutlaVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA nmurukutla@vitalstrategies.org.
Ashish K GuptaVital Strategies, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1735-3323
Meena MaharjanVital Strategies, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-7226
Cecilia FabrizioVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Emily W MyersVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew JohnsonIpsos, London, UK.
Virginia NkwanziIpsos, Kampala, Uganda.
Colby A WilkasonResolve To Save Lives, An initiative to Vital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Natalie LaceyIpsos, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Akhona TshangelaAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, African Union, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Benjamin DjoudalbayeAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, African Union, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Amanda McClellandResolve To Save Lives, An initiative to Vital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the psychosocial and sociodemographic factors that affected adherence to COVID-19 public health and social measures (PHSMs), and to identify the factors that most strongly related to whether citizens followed public health guidance.

designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND

participantsNationally representative telephone surveys were conducted from 4-17 August 2020 in 18 African Union Member States. A total of 21 600 adults (mean age=32.7 years, SD=11.4) were interviewed (1200 in each country). OUTCOME MEASURES: Information including sociodemographics, adherence to PHSMs and psychosocial variables was collected. Logistic regression models examined the association between PHSM adherence (eg, physical distancing, gathering restrictions) and sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics (eg, risk perception, trust). Factors affecting adherence were ranked using the Shapley regression decomposition method.

resultsAdherence to PHSMs was high, with better adherence to personal than community PHSMs (65.5% vs 30.2%, p<0.05). Psychosocial measures were significantly associated with personal and community PHSMs (p<0.05). Women and older adults demonstrated better adherence to personal PHSMs (adjusted OR (aOR): women=1.43, age=1.01, p

conclusionsPsychosocial factors, particularly trust in authorities and institutions, played a critical role in PHSM adherence. Adherence to community PHSMs was lower than personal PHSMs since they can impose significant burdens, particularly on the socially vulnerable.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAfrican UnionAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantPandemicsPublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesWaterWateradherenceCOVID-19non-pharmaceutical interventionspsychosocial determinantsPublic health and social measuresrisk perceptionstrust

Identifiers

PMID35728899
PMCPMC9213762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.