Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35728652›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2022

Activation and Speciation Mechanisms in Class A GPCRs.

Bentley Wingert, Pemra Doruker, Ivet Bahar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bentley WingertDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Pemra DorukerDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: bahar@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Toward a Deeper Understanding of Allostery and Allotargeting by Computational ApproachesR01GM139297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ivet Bahar · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate development of allosteric modulators of GPCRs require a thorough assessment of their sequence, structure, and dynamics, toward gaining insights into their mechanisms of actions shared by family members, as well as dynamic features that distinguish subfamilies. Building on recent progress in the characterization of the signature dynamics of proteins, we analyzed here a dataset of 160 Class A GPCRs to determine their sequence similarities, structural landscape, and dynamic features across different species (human, bovine, mouse, squid, and rat), different activation states (active/inactive), and different subfamilies. The two dominant directions of variability across experimentally resolved structures, identified by principal component analysis of the dataset, shed light to cooperative mechanisms of activation, subfamily differentiation, and speciation of Class A GPCRs. The analysis reveals the functional significance of the conformational flexibilities of specific structural elements, including: the dominant role of the intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) together with the cytoplasmic ends of the adjoining helices TM5 and TM6 in enabling allosteric activation; the role of particular structural motifs at the extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) connecting TM4 and TM5 in binding ligands specific to different subfamilies; or even the differentiation of the N-terminal conformation across different species. Detailed analyses of the modes of motions accessible to the members of the dataset and their variations across members demonstrate how the active and inactive states of GPCRs obey distinct conformational dynamics. The collective fluctuations of the GPCRs are robustly defined in the active state, while the inactive conformers exhibit broad variance among members.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledAnimalsCattleDatasets as TopicHumansLigandsMiceMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryRatsLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledconformational landscapeelastic network modelG-protein coupled receptorsprincipal component analysissignature dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35728652
PMCPMC10129049
OpenAlexW4283066820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.